We gained the trust of 51 841 companies with 576 141 employees

What's new

Position of the Union of Entrepreneurs and Employers on the proposed text of the directive on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment

Warsaw, 5th October, 2018


Position of the Union of Entrepreneurs and Employers on the proposed text of the directive on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment


The draft Directive on disposable plastic products by the European Commission raises strong concerns of the business community. In the long-term, it will affect many Polish entities in a strongly negative way, significantly worsening their situation.


It should be noted that the original proposal raises far-reaching concerns, but the situation is getting even more dangerous, as in recent weeks there has been a significant tightening of the course taken. Members of the European Parliament have made numerous amendments, two of which disproportionately and in an ill-considered manner hit the Polish tobacco industry. This is important inasmuch as in this industry Poland has a strong competitive advantage over other EU markets, both in terms of production volume as well as the size of investments and employment. The concerns about the shape of the draft Directive and the amendments tabled is only reinforced by the fact that the vote in the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) will take place on 10th October while the works in both the Council and the European Parliament are held on the principle of the so-called “fast track”.


The first amendment proposed by EU parliamentarians concerns the introduction of additional information obligations for manufacturers of tobacco products regarding appropriate methods of disposal of garbage, the effects of illegal littering, and information about the presence of plastic in the product. One must note that the appearance of a cigarette pack is already regulated by numerous legal acts. Relatively recently, the appearance thereof has been significantly interfered with, imposing on manufacturers the obligation to put health warnings on the packaging of tobacco products relating to the effects of tobacco use. The proposal to impose additional obligations on manufacturers of tobacco products in terms of informing about the proper ways of disposing of garbage, the consequences of illegal littering, or the content of plastic in the product, raises legitimate objections. It must be emphasised that the European Commission took the above-mentioned conditions to be considered when designing the directive in its current shape.

The second amendment aims to reduce the use of cigarette filters, i.e. of the elements that have a key health impact as far as the product goes, which is to limit the amount of harmful substances that end up in consumers’ organisms. The observance of acceptable concentration levels of certain substances (resulting from legal acts of the European Union) requires the use of filters with appropriate properties. It must be highlighted that despite of the fact that many studies have been conducted over the years, one has yet not managed to find an appropriate substitute for the currently used cigarette filters. Any limitation to the possibility of using filters is therefore tantamount to an adequate limitation of the production and sales of tobacco products. In practical terms, this would entail a real risk of production reduction or even closure of factories of tobacco producers in Poland. In the tobacco industry, there would be reductions of employment, while the revenues to the state budget due to excise tax on tobacco products would be significantly reduced. It seems that the scale of the potential negative effects of accepting the amendments proposed by Members of the European Parliament is large enough to clearly oppose them.


In recent years, Western European countries moved the production of tobacco products to the east, primarily to our country. Polish factories, serving hitherto the our local market, started to manufacture products for exports – in total to a several dozen countries. Poland became the industry leader. Presently, the Western European countries are pushing the solutions described above, which will result in the elimination of the established market position of Polish factories, as well as the mass dismissals of tobacco industry employees.


We recognise the need of legislation and the importance thereof, aimed at reducing the amount of plastic in the natural environment. However, we would count on actions to be undertaken that represent a wider socio-economic compromise.



Fot. marcin049/

Najnowsze artykuły

The Union of Entrepreneurs and Employers appeals to Polish entrepreneurs regarding the Sunday elections to the European Parliament

This coming Sunday, May 26th, citizens of the European Union will elect their representatives to the European Parliament. This institution has a significant impact on legislation at the European level, including legislative solutions key from the entrepreneurs’ point of view. Several past years have taught us that defending the interests of Polish companies and consumers on the common European market requires arduous work of our representatives in Brussels.

The most dangerous version of the entrepreneur’s test is the action of the ministry without changing the law, on the basis of a change in the interpretation of the law

Warsaw, 20th May 2019   The most dangerous version of the entrepreneur’s test is the action of the ministry without changing the law, on the basis of a change in the interpretation of the law   Regardless of whether its introduction will be a legislative amendment or a change in the way the law is […]

Sudden treacherous changes in tax interpretations returning and taxes being calculated 5 years back? Is the Constitution of Business really in force?

Entrepreneurs from the HoReCa industry are experiencing problems that according to the government should not exist. Their non-existence was supposed to be guaranteed by the Constitution for Business and its provisions saying that “law is not retroactive”, as well as by the so-called “principle of legal certainty”. The problems concern VAT rates applied before 2016. That year, the Minister of Finance issued a general interpretation, according to which the sale of ready-to-eat dishes should be taxed at the appropriate for restaurant services rate of 8%, not 5% appropriate for delivery of ready meals and meals.


If you want to receive weekly information from Brussels
Click here

Become a ZPP Member!

Join us!

By giving your email address, you grant permission to the ZPP to send you information

Our websites

Our newsletters